Movie Sequel Bait Comedy Movies: the Ugly Truth Behind Hollywood’s Endless Setups
There’s a special kind of suspense—not the Hitchcockian variety, but the slow-building, soul-sapping tension you feel when a comedy movie doesn’t want to end. You’re laughing, the credits are rolling… and then: a shadowy new villain appears, a character winks at the camera, or a slick post-credit scene dangles the promise of “more to come.” If you’ve ever experienced that peculiar blend of amusement and exasperation, congratulations: you’ve been caught in the web of movie sequel bait comedy movies. This phenomenon isn’t a glitch in Hollywood’s system—it’s a calculated, billion-dollar strategy. Studios want your ticket stub today, but they’re banking even harder on your curiosity for tomorrow. So why do these setups dominate the comedy landscape, why are sequels rarely as good as the originals, and what exactly is the cost—to art, to audiences, to the very idea of what makes us laugh? Get ready to peel back the curtain, because we’re diving deep into the messy, hilarious, and sometimes infuriating world of comedy sequel bait.
Setting the stage: what are movie sequel bait comedy movies?
Defining sequel bait in comedy films
Sequel baiting isn’t just a throwaway afterthought—it’s a finely tuned marketing tactic embedded right into the script. In comedy movies, “sequel bait” refers to any overt or subtle narrative device meant to signal, tease, or outright promise a follow-up. This can range from cliffhangers and unresolved plot threads to last-minute character reveals or winks at the audience about future adventures. What distinguishes true sequel bait from an organic sequel setup is intent: whereas organic sequels emerge from unexpected audience love (think “Airplane!”), sequel bait is premeditated, built into the movie’s DNA before the first ticket is even sold.
There’s a critical difference between intentional sequel baiting and accidental franchise creation. The former involves deliberate, sometimes even contractual decisions—casting big names for multi-picture deals, shoehorning in new characters late in the film, or filming post-credit scenes before box office numbers are even known. The latter arises when a comedy unexpectedly becomes a cultural touchstone, prompting sequels as an afterthought. Studios are increasingly favoring the former, seeing greater financial security in planned franchises.
Definition list:
A narrative technique, often involving cliffhangers or unresolved storylines, designed to spark anticipation for a follow-up film. Common in contemporary comedy, it’s a studio’s insurance policy for franchising and merchandise.
A specific plot point or new character introduced with the explicit purpose of anchoring future sequels. The distinction is that a “hook” is usually more blatant and sometimes disrupts the current story’s flow for setup’s sake.
A sequel that partially resets a franchise, bringing in new characters or themes while retaining enough familiar elements to keep old fans invested. In comedy, this often means the same jokes in new packaging.
Comedy cast glancing nervously at a 'To Be Continued' neon sign captures the essence of sequel bait in Hollywood comedy movies.
Early examples of sequel baiting lurk in comedy’s past, though often with more innocence than calculation. “The Pink Panther” (1963) wasn’t meant to launch a franchise, but the unexpected popularity of Inspector Clouseau led to a string of sequels. By contrast, in recent decades, studios approach comedy with franchise blueprints in hand, aiming to build not just movies, but whole empires.
Why the trend exploded: industry and audience shifts
The explosion of sequel baiting in comedies didn’t happen in a vacuum. The economics of modern filmmaking have shifted dramatically: as production costs spiral and global distribution becomes essential, studios bet on familiar brands to minimize risk. According to industry analysts, comedy sequels—regardless of critical reception—almost always guarantee a certain baseline return, thanks to brand recognition and built-in audiences.
Audiences, too, are complicit. Streaming has rewired expectations, training viewers to anticipate ongoing stories and multi-part sagas. Comedy, once the playground of one-off absurdity, now operates like a serialized event. Binge-watching culture rewards continuity, and social media amplifies every teaser, every rumor of a possible sequel.
| Year | Notable Comedy Sequel Bait | Critical Reception (Rotten Tomatoes) | Box Office (US, $M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1984 | Ghostbusters | 97% | 295 |
| 1994 | Dumb and Dumber | 68% | 127 |
| 2012 | 21 Jump Street | 85% | 138 |
| 2014 | 22 Jump Street | 84% | 191 |
| 2015 | Ted 2 | 44% | 81 |
| 2017 | Daddy’s Home 2 | 21% | 104 |
| 2021 | Coming 2 America | 49% | N/A (Streaming) |
Table 1: Timeline of major comedy sequel baits, with critical and box office data.
Source: Original analysis based on Rotten Tomatoes, Box Office Mojo, industry reports.
The shift to streaming and global distribution has only supercharged the trend. International markets—especially China and India—now account for a significant share of comedy revenue, driving studios to prioritize series potential over standalone stories. Merchandise, cross-media tie-ins, and streaming syndication rights all depend on the longevity of the brand, not the singularity of the joke.
How to spot a sequel bait comedy movie
- Unresolved storylines: If there’s no real narrative closure, and you’re left with more questions than answers, beware.
- Late new character introductions: A mysterious new villain or quirky sidekick appears out of nowhere in the third act.
- Heavy-handed post-credit scenes: The movie ends, but a stinger teases “the next adventure”—before you even know if you like the first.
- Repeated franchise brand drops: The script name-checks its own title or universe so frequently it feels forced.
- Multi-film casting contracts: News leaks about actors signing for several films before the original even premieres.
- Merchandise and tie-ins launched early: Toys, games, or books hit shelves before the movie is out, signaling franchise intentions.
- Streaming cliffhanger endings: Films debuting online often end with a blatant setup for more.
Practical tip: If your gut tells you “this is just part one,” you’re probably right. Look for creative choices that seem less about serving the current story and more about keeping the door open for another round of box office receipts.
A staged photo of studio executives huddled around a comedy script, symbolizing the greenlighting of comedy sequels.
A brief, messy history: where did sequel baiting in comedy begin?
The origins: accidental vs. calculated franchises
Comedy’s first franchises were often the result of serendipity, not strategy. “The Pink Panther” series began as a one-off, but Peter Sellers’ performance struck such a chord that studios rushed to capitalize. Decades later, “Police Academy” (1984) became an unplanned hit, spawning a flurry of sequels—some embraced, others panned.
The pivot from accidental to calculated franchise-building arrived with the blockbuster era. Studios, emboldened by the success of tentpole action and superhero films, began inserting sequel hooks into comedies before the original even premiered. The post-credit cookie became obligatory, not optional.
| Organic Franchise | Manufactured Franchise | Audience Response | Longevity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Airplane! (1980, 1982) | The Hangover (2009–2013) | Organic: Cult status, warm fans | Moderate |
| The Pink Panther (1963–2009) | 21 Jump Street (2012–14) | Manufactured: Mixed, fatigue | High |
| Police Academy (1984–1994) | Daddy’s Home (2015–17) | Manufactured: Worsening reviews | Short-lived |
Table 2: Comparison of organic vs. manufactured comedy franchises.
Source: Original analysis based on Rotten Tomatoes, Box Office Mojo.
The 1990s and 2000s: the arms race for franchises
The 1990s ushered in an arms race for comedy franchises. Studios realized that with big enough stars and memorable enough gags, audiences would show up for endless variations on a theme. Take “Dumb and Dumber”—a comedy so beloved that, despite mediocre reviews for its sequels and prequels, studios kept rolling the dice.
A case study in shameless sequel baiting: “Ace Ventura: When Nature Calls” (1995) ended with Jim Carrey’s character embarking on a new journey, hinting at more absurdity to come. While the follow-up never materialized, the intention was clear: keep the cash register ringing.
“We knew from day one that leaving the door open was essential. Audiences today want the comfort of the familiar, and the studio wants the comfort of guaranteed returns. The sequel bait trend was inevitable—risk aversion is the new creative gospel.” — Alex, film producer (illustrative quote, based on industry trends)
Modern era: streaming and the endless sequel tease
Streaming platforms have turbocharged the race to sequel bait. With series bingeing now the norm, comedies are plotted to ensure you never quite feel done—always one more setup, one more dangling subplot. A recent example: “Murder Mystery 2” on Netflix left audiences with a cliffhanger that felt more like an ad for the next installment than a conclusion.
A vibrant photo illustrating a streaming homepage stacked with queued comedy sequels, symbolizing the relentless push for franchise continuity.
Why Hollywood can’t quit: the economic engine behind comedy sequel bait
Box office, risk, and the franchise formula
Franchise-building isn’t just a creative exercise—it’s a numbers game. Studios invest heavily in sequels because the economics are irresistible. According to current data, comedy sequels may not always out-earn originals, but they virtually guarantee profitability due to lower marketing costs and pre-existing fanbases.
| Film | Box Office ($M) | Streaming Revenue (Est.) | Production Budget ($M) | Profit Margin (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21 Jump Street (2012) | 138 | N/A | 42 | ~69% |
| 22 Jump Street (2014) | 191 | N/A | 50 | ~82% |
| Ted (2012) | 219 | N/A | 50 | ~77% |
| Ted 2 (2015) | 81 | N/A | 68 | ~19% |
| Coming 2 America (2021) | N/A | Undisclosed (Amazon) | 60 | N/A |
Table 3: Statistical summary comparing box office and streaming revenues for top comedy sequel baits in the last decade.
Source: Original analysis based on Box Office Mojo, The Numbers, industry reports.
Creative bankruptcy or strategic genius?
Critics decry sequel baiting as the death of originality—a symptom of creative bankruptcy. But the truth is more nuanced. For every soulless cash grab, there’s a sequel that elevates the original, mining deeper laughs or subverting expectations.
“Against the odds, some comedy sequels deliver—either expanding the universe, giving side characters their due, or doubling down on the absurdity. What separates the great from the forgettable is intention; sequels made for love, not just money, still break through.” — Jamie, film critic (illustrative, grounded in critical consensus)
Not all sequel baits are lazy; some are clever evolutions of a beloved formula, striking the precarious balance between nostalgia and innovation.
The hidden benefits nobody talks about
- Career longevity for actors: Multi-film deals mean steady work and higher profiles for comedic talent.
- Diversity in writers’ rooms: Franchises often bring in new voices, especially as they expand.
- Community building: Recurring characters and running gags foster devoted fan communities.
- Secondary markets: Each sequel offers new avenues for syndication and international sales.
- Merchandise opportunities: Franchise comedies sell not just tickets, but games, toys, and even theme park attractions.
- Cross-media storytelling: Expanded universes allow for web series, graphic novels, and more.
- Testing ground for new talent: Sequels often introduce future stars in supporting roles.
Merchandising and secondary markets are potent motivators. Licensing deals for even mediocre sequels can outpace box office returns, making the risk of creative staleness seem minor in comparison.
A lively shot from a comedy set, walls plastered with branded merchandise, showcasing the commercial ecosystem behind franchise comedies.
When sequel baiting backfires: legendary flops and cult classics
The notorious failures: when audiences rebel
For every franchise triumph, there’s a cautionary tale of sequel bait gone wrong. “Zoolander 2” (2016) was hyped with every trick in the Hollywood playbook: cameos, teasers, and stingers for further misadventures. The result? A box office bomb and critical disaster, sinking any hope for a third installment.
Audience backlash can be swift and brutal. Social media erupts with memes, negative reviews trend on aggregators, and some films become synonymous with “why bother?” This genre of disappointment is a modern rite of passage for comedy fans.
| Film | Original RT Score | Sequel RT Score |
|---|---|---|
| Zoolander (2001) | 64% | 22% |
| Anchorman (2004) | 66% | 75% |
| Dumb and Dumber (1994) | 68% | 30% |
| Ghostbusters (1984) | 97% | 74% (2016) |
Table 4: Comparison of Rotten Tomatoes scores for original vs. sequel bait comedies.
Source: Original analysis based on Rotten Tomatoes.
Cult classics born from failed sequel plans
But sometimes, a failed sequel bait grows into a cult obsession. “MacGruber” (2010), a box office flop, became a midnight movie staple and eventually spawned a streaming series. “Hot Rod” (2007) never got its intended sequel, yet its absurd humor found new life in fan communities. “Superstar” (1999), written off as a misfire, now enjoys ironic reappraisal.
“Comedy is about risk. When a sequel bait fails, it can sting—but sometimes, failure makes a film immortal. Fans reclaim what studios discard, finding community in the oddballs and also-rans.” — Taylor, indie filmmaker (illustrative quote rooted in industry analysis)
Lessons learned: what not to do
- Don’t neglect closure: Always resolve the main story, even if teasing more.
- Avoid shoehorning new villains: Late additions rarely land with audiences.
- Respect the core cast: Recasting or sidelining beloved characters is a recipe for backlash.
- Beware forced callbacks: Nostalgia can’t carry a weak script.
- Don’t overhype potential sequels: Let the current film stand on its own.
- Monitor audience fatigue: Too many sequels in too little time kills momentum.
- Balance fan service and innovation: Don’t pander—surprise.
- Test screenings matter: Listen to feedback, but don’t let it dictate every decision.
Industry wisdom is clear: when sequel baiting puts commerce ahead of character or story, the audience rebels. Legendary flops become cautionary tales in studio boardrooms.
Photo of a theater marquee advertising a non-existent sequel, using shadowed lighting to evoke the mood of dashed expectations.
The anatomy of a successful comedy sequel bait
Blueprints for sequels that actually deliver
Success in sequel baiting isn’t luck—it’s a matter of craft. The best comedy sequels walk a tightrope: they promise more without cheapening what came before. This requires a deft balance of structure, character, and timing.
Three standout examples:
- “22 Jump Street” (2014) leaned into self-aware meta-comedy, satirizing the very concept of franchises.
- “Anchorman 2” (2013) expanded its world while keeping the ensemble’s chemistry front and center.
- “Wayne’s World 2” (1993) delivered callbacks without feeling repetitive, deepening its absurd universe.
Definition list:
A conclusion that resolves the current story but hints at future adventures, inviting curiosity without demanding commitment.
An established character whose presence bridges the original and the sequel, providing continuity and nostalgia.
A recurring joke or reference, used to tie sequels together and reward attentive fans.
Audience psychology: why we fall for the bait
Psychologically, audiences crave familiarity and community. Comedy sequels offer the comfort of inside jokes and beloved characters, tapping into deep-rooted desires for belonging. According to social science research, viewers form emotional bonds with comedic ensembles, making them more likely to return for subsequent installments even if the script is weaker.
Montage photo of comedy fans reacting to sequel news, underscoring the emotional investment behind franchise loyalty.
How to make it work: practical tips for creators
- Prioritize narrative closure: Always give audiences a satisfying ending, with or without a sequel hook.
- Plant organic hooks: Introduce future possibilities subtly, not as a blunt commercial.
- Develop ensemble chemistry: Audiences return for relationships, not just gags.
- Evolve the premise: Escalate stakes or absurdity, don’t just repeat the first film.
- Limit fan service: Use callbacks sparingly—new jokes are your lifeblood.
- Test and revise: Use screenings to fine-tune pacing and setup/payoff balance.
“The key to a great comedy sequel setup? Leave them laughing—and leave them wanting, but not needing, more. That’s the art of sending an audience home happy, not hungry.” — Morgan, comedy screenwriter (illustrative, based on professional commentary)
Beyond Hollywood: international twists on comedy sequel bait
How other film industries approach sequel baiting
Hollywood’s approach isn’t universal. In the UK, comedy sequels like “The Inbetweeners Movie” (2011) tend to be finite, ending definitively. Indian cinema, meanwhile, often uses sequel bait as a marketing tool—promoting anticipated returns before the original’s release. Japan’s comedy sequels, such as the “Thermae Romae” series, blend cross-media tie-ins and anime-style serialization.
A notable example: “Welcome to the Sticks” (“Bienvenue chez les Ch’tis,” France, 2008) hinted at follow-ups but chose not to overplay its hand, resulting in immense critical and commercial success.
| Country | Sequel Bait Strategy | Audience Reaction | Example Film |
|---|---|---|---|
| USA | Overt hooks, multi-film | Mixed, fatigue risk | 21 Jump Street |
| UK | Closed arcs, rare sequels | Strong, finite hype | The Inbetweeners Movie |
| India | Pre-release sequel teasers | High, event status | Golmaal series |
| Japan | Cross-media, serialized | Niche, loyal fans | Thermae Romae |
Table 5: Feature matrix comparing global sequel bait strategies in comedy.
Source: Original analysis based on industry research and box office data.
Cultural factors shaping audience expectations
Culture shapes how sequel bait is received. British comedy fans, raised on limited-run series, expect closure and resist endless franchising. Indian audiences, used to Bollywood’s interconnected universes, embrace serial comedies as communal events. Japanese fans reward intricate world-building across films, manga, and TV.
Examples abound: “Johnny English” (UK) succeeded with spaced-out, self-contained sequels. The “Golmaal” franchise (India) thrives on recurring cast and ever-escalating chaos. Japan’s “Thermae Romae” proves that even bathhouse jokes can sustain multi-platform serialization—if the world is richly built.
Colorful collage of international comedy film posters, each subtly hinting at sequel potential.
Lessons from abroad for Hollywood creators
- Emphasize narrative finality, even in franchises.
- Use satire and self-awareness to refresh sequels.
- Blend media formats for richer worlds.
- Space sequels over years, not months, to avoid fatigue.
- Cast new talent alongside old favorites.
- Respect genre boundaries—don’t force action tropes into pure comedy.
Hollywood can learn from international approaches, particularly the value of restraint and the power of cultural specificity. For viewers seeking global comedy gems and untapped sequel styles, platforms like tasteray.com are invaluable guides to this broader landscape.
Debunking myths: what most people get wrong about comedy sequels
Mythbusting: not all sequel baits are soulless cash grabs
Critics love to paint all sequel bait as cynical, but reality is more complex. Sometimes, creative teams passionately want to continue a story—think “Hot Fuzz” and the Cornetto Trilogy, which organically evolved due to fan demand and creator inspiration.
Other times, studio mandates clash with genuine creative ambition, resulting in awkward hybrids. But the myth that all sequel baits are joyless is debunked by examples where cast and crew’s enthusiasm shines through.
“Some of our most beloved comedies were never meant to be franchises, but once the spark was lit, the creative team poured their soul into every follow-up. Misunderstood sequels often gain respect over time—their legacy isn’t always obvious at first.” — Jordan, film historian (illustrative, reflecting academic consensus)
When sequel baiting is actually good for creativity
Open endings and sequel setups can foster innovation. The “Austin Powers” series escalated its absurdity with each entry, inventing new running gags and satirical targets. The “Pitch Perfect” trilogy leaned into ensemble dynamics, allowing different characters to shine and stories to evolve.
Photo of comedy writers collaborating energetically, symbolizing the creative boost sequel setups can provide.
The myth of 'franchise fatigue' in comedy
While headlines proclaim “franchise fatigue,” the data paints a nuanced picture. Box office drops are real for some sequels, but others outperform originals (“22 Jump Street,” “Anchorman 2”). Streaming engagement remains high for familiar comedy brands, and social media communities thrive on shared references and inside jokes. Fatigue sets in not from sequels alone, but from dull, formulaic ones that underestimate their audience.
How to be a smarter viewer: navigating the sequel bait minefield
Spotting the red flags before you buy a ticket
- The trailer pushes “the next chapter” over unique jokes.
- Early marketing leaks new character contracts.
- Merchandising blitz hits before the premiere.
- Social media teases “universe expansion.”
- Test screening news features “multiple endings.”
- Previous sequels in the series underperformed critically.
- The creative team is new, but the cast is the same.
Read between the lines: a comedy marketed on nostalgia rather than new laughs is probably a sequel setup in disguise. Before you commit, check discussions and trajectories on tasteray.com for audience sentiment and franchise health.
What to do when the sequel never comes
If you’re left hanging after a bait-filled comedy, you’re not alone. Fan campaigns—hashtags, petitions, and viral memes—sometimes push studios to greenlight long-delayed sequels or spinoffs. Other times, closure is found in online communities, fan fiction, or creative reinterpretations.
Photo capturing the mood of disappointed audiences after a movie that left too many sequel threads unresolved.
How to enjoy the ride—even if it’s bait
- Focus on the movie’s best jokes—enjoy the moment.
- Appreciate cast chemistry and character dynamics.
- Participate in fan discussions to reinterpret ambiguous endings.
- Use platforms like tasteray.com to explore similar films and find closure.
- Embrace the randomness—sometimes the best laughter comes from the unexpected.
Imperfect movies can still deliver unforgettable moments. Savvy viewing—questioning motives, celebrating what works, and ignoring what doesn’t—makes for a richer experience.
The future of comedy and sequel bait: where do we go from here?
Emerging trends: interactive and streaming-driven comedy franchises
Digital platforms are reshaping sequel baiting. Interactive comedies like Netflix’s “Kimmy vs. the Reverend” invite audiences to choose the story’s direction, blurring the line between film and franchise. Branching sequel paths and user-driven narratives are no longer sci-fi—they’re part of the comedy ecosystem.
A photo imagining the future of comedy sequel bait: streaming platforms displaying interactive, branching choices.
What audiences really want: is there hope for originality?
Recent surveys show that comedy fans crave originality but aren’t opposed to sequels—if they feel justified. Hits like “Booksmart” (2019) and “Game Night” (2018) succeeded without sequel setups, proving that fresh ideas still have an audience.
| Film | Originality (Critics/100) | Sequel Bait (Y/N) | Audience Score (/10) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Booksmart (2019) | 97 | No | 7.2 |
| Game Night (2018) | 85 | No | 7.0 |
| 22 Jump Street (2014) | 84 | Yes | 7.0 |
| Ted 2 (2015) | 44 | Yes | 6.3 |
Table 6: Comparison of recent original comedies vs. sequel baits—critical and audience response.
Source: Original analysis based on IMDb, Rotten Tomatoes.
Final thoughts: embracing the chaos of movie sequel bait comedy movies
Peel back the shiny veneers and you’ll find: movie sequel bait comedy movies are a mirror of the times—equal parts creative spark and corporate calculation. They reflect our desire for new laughs and familiar faces, our craving for closure and our tolerance for cliffhangers. For creators, the challenge is to balance art with commerce; for audiences, to demand more but settle for enough. In the end, the chaos of comedy sequels is pop culture’s ongoing joke—a punchline that refuses to end.
Related controversies and adjacent topics
Franchise fatigue: how it’s changing the comedy landscape
The avalanche of sequels has real consequences for the comedy genre. As studios double down on safe bets, riskier, quirkier projects struggle to get made. Recent timelines underscore a cycle: initial excitement, followed by diminishing returns, then either reinvention or oblivion.
Photo evoking an editorial cartoon: a comedian dwarfed by a mountain of sequel scripts, symbolizing franchise fatigue.
Spin-offs, reboots, and the gray area between
Spin-offs and reboots are close cousins to sequel bait, but with their own quirks. A spin-off focuses on supporting characters (“Minions”), a reboot wipes the slate clean (“Ghostbusters” 2016), and a “sidequel” tells a parallel story. Blurred boundaries are the new normal, as studios experiment with every flavor of franchise.
Definition list:
A new film or show featuring secondary characters from an original, exploring different stories but within the same universe.
A restart of an established franchise, often with a new cast and approach, disregarding previous continuity.
A story set parallel to the original, exploring unseen angles or characters during the same timeline.
Notable examples: “Get Him to the Greek” (spin-off from “Forgetting Sarah Marshall”), “Ghostbusters” (2016, reboot), and “Harold & Kumar Escape from Guantanamo Bay” (sidequel/sequel hybrid).
Comedy sequels that outperformed the originals
- “22 Jump Street” (2014): Turned its own sequel status into a running gag, earning higher box office than the first.
- “Anchorman 2: The Legend Continues” (2013): Expanded its universe with bold new gags.
- “Wayne’s World 2” (1993): Kept the spirit—and laughs—alive, deepening the cult.
- “American Pie 2” (2001): Built on nostalgia and ensemble chemistry.
- “The Naked Gun 2½” (1991): Leaned into absurdity, surpassing expectations.
- “Bridget Jones: The Edge of Reason” (2004): Outperformed the original in multiple international markets.
These rare successes show that, with care and craft, comedy sequels can exceed their origins. The lesson? Respect the audience, innovate inside the formula, and never mistake setup for substance.
Conclusion
Comedy sequel bait is the double-edged sword of Hollywood: it keeps the laughter alive but often leaves us wanting more—or less. As this in-depth dive shows, the trend is both a creative conundrum and a commercial juggernaut, fueled by streaming, global markets, and our own hunger for the familiar. Whether you love the setups or dread the inevitable letdowns, understanding movie sequel bait comedy movies arms you with the savvy to enjoy the ride, spot the traps, and demand better from studios. For those navigating the maze of what to watch next, resources like tasteray.com are your allies, helping you find the genuine gems amid the endless setups. The punchline? In the world of comedy franchises, the only thing more persistent than laughter is the hope for a sequel that truly earns its place.
Ready to Never Wonder Again?
Join thousands who've discovered their perfect movie match with Tasteray