Environmental Movies: Subversive Power, Hidden Agendas, and Culture Shocks

Forget the feel-good “green” stories you’ve been spoon-fed. Environmental movies have become one of the most subversive, polarizing, and impactful forces in global culture—a wild collision of activism, art, propaganda, and commerce. In an era where eco-fatigue is as real as climate change, these films force us to confront not just environmental collapse but the cynicism and hope tangled in the stories we tell. If you think eco-cinema is all gentle documentaries and recycled Hollywood tropes, brace yourself. Here are 27 films that don’t just reflect the state of the world—they demand you see it differently. Welcome to the true underground of environmental movies, where every frame could be a call to arms or a smokescreen.

---

The rise of environmental movies: a brief, brutal history

Early activist films: when rebellion met celluloid

The roots of environmental movies weren’t planted in boardrooms or polished studios—they grew out of protest, raw anger, and the grit of renegade filmmakers risking arrest and career suicide. The 1930s saw Pare Lorentz’s government-commissioned works like The Plow That Broke the Plains, shot on shoestring budgets and wielded as weapons to sway public sentiment during the Dust Bowl. By the late 1960s and ‘70s, as the smog thickened over cities and rivers caught fire, underground crews took to the streets with grainy cameras, documenting pollution, wildlife die-offs, and protests long before it was safe—or cool.

Gritty film crew documents urban pollution, 1970s—an origin story of activist environmental movies and eco-cinema.

These early films were urgent dispatches from the front lines of environmental disaster. Titles like Silent Running and Our Daily Bread pulled no punches, exposing corporate negligence and political indifference. According to the Britannica environmental history timeline, 2023, the risks were real: censorship, blacklisting, and even violence. Budgets were often scraped together from activist donations or out-of-pocket by the filmmakers themselves.

"Movies were our weapons when nobody listened to the scientists." — Alex, environmental filmmaker (illustrative quote based on verified accounts)

Table 1: Early environmental movies and their impact. Source: Britannica, 2023

Hollywood takes notice: big studios go green (or do they?)

By the late 1980s, Hollywood smelled more than disaster—it smelled cash. Suddenly, major studios were rushing to churn out eco-thrillers and “message” movies, often featuring A-listers and eye-popping budgets. But for every Erin Brockovich or The Day After Tomorrow (which cost over $125 million), there was a chorus of activists rolling their eyes at the sanitized, CGI-heavy storytelling. According to the Treehugger list of top environmental films, 2023, big-budget productions often outspent indie documentaries by 100-fold, but the latter’s impact was disproportionately higher.

The numbers are telling: while blockbusters sometimes topped box office charts, grassroots documentaries like The Cove or An Inconvenient Truth sparked real policy conversations and inspired direct action. The difference? Authenticity, urgency, and a willingness to ruffle feathers.

7 signs a movie is greenwashing, not genuinely environmental:

• Glossy visuals that gloss over real problems
• Environmental villains with cartoonish motives
• Happy endings that ignore systemic issues
• Corporate sponsorships front and center
• Activists depicted as extremists or naive
• Facts cherry-picked or dramatically warped for effect
• No mention of actionable solutions—just platitudes

Hollywood’s eco-ambivalence: big-budget studio set with rainforest and oil rig props highlighting the clash between spectacle and substance in environmental movies.

Eco-dystopias and cli-fi: the birth of a new subgenre

Somewhere along the timeline, environmental movies mutated into something stranger: eco-dystopias and climate fiction (“cli-fi”). Films like Snowpiercer, Okja, and Don’t Look Up didn’t just warn of environmental collapse—they immersed audiences in worlds where it was already too late. According to a 2024 analysis by Yale Climate Connections, cli-fi movies have exploded in popularity, using speculative settings to make climate risk immediate and visceral.

But how accurate are these visions? The Day After Tomorrow exaggerated superstorms for drama, drawing criticism from scientists, while Okja blurred the line between animal rights satire and biotech horror. Don’t Look Up was a razor-sharp allegory for environmental denialism, sparking both viral memes and heated debate over its blunt messaging.

Table 2: Top eco-dystopian films rated on realism, impact, influence. Source: Original analysis based on Yale Climate Connections, 2024, Earth.Org, 2024

"Fiction lets us live through the consequences—before they’re real." — Jamie, climate fiction enthusiast (illustrative quote grounded in research)

Modern documentary boom: truth, spectacle, and audience fatigue

Streaming has changed the game. In 2023–2024, the sheer volume of environmental documentaries exploded, with platforms like Netflix, Hulu, and independent streamers hosting everything from My Octopus Teacher to Burning Injustice. According to Earth.Org’s best environmental films list, 2024, this surge has democratized access—but also risks numbing viewers with endless disaster narratives.

Documentary filmmaker interviewing climate refugee—capturing raw, authentic narratives that drive impact in environmental movies.

Recent data shows that while blockbusters trend globally, only certain documentaries—those with clear calls to action or emotional hooks—translate into measurable change. The Human Element is credited with influencing environmental education curricula, while RiverBlue helped spark anti-pollution campaigns in the fashion industry. Others, despite millions of streams, fade into digital noise.

6 tactics successful environmental docs use to move people to action:

1. Anchor stories in individual human experiences—not just statistics
2. Offer tangible next steps for viewers (petitions, donations, activism)
3. Leverage emotional highs and lows to maintain urgency
4. Feature diverse, relatable protagonists (not only scientists or celebrities)
5. Use arresting visuals that stick long after credits roll
6. Partner with NGOs and movements for real-world follow-through

---

Debunking eco-cinema: myths vs. reality

Myth #1: environmental movies are just boring documentaries

It’s a tired stereotype: environmental movies as monotonous lectures, fit only for classrooms or guilt trips. But the modern eco-cinema landscape is a genre-smashing, pulse-raising battlefield, blending thrillers, animation, science fiction, and even horror to deliver messages that linger. According to a 2024 Netflix Tudum feature on environmental movies, the diversity of styles now ranges from wild animation in Wall-E to adrenaline-charged eco-thrillers like Deepwater Horizon.

Definition List:

• Eco-cinema: A broad spectrum of films—from documentary to drama to thriller—focused on environmental themes, often with a goal of spurring awareness or action.
• Cli-fi: Climate fiction; speculative narratives exploring the consequences of climate change, both plausible and fantastical.
• Environmental thriller: Films that use suspense, action, or investigative storytelling to dramatize ecological disasters or crimes.

"If you think these films are all lectures, you’re not paying attention." — Morgan, film critic (illustrative based on critical opinion)

Myth #2: these movies only preach to the choir

A persistent cliché is that only activists watch environmental movies. In reality, streaming analytics and festival data reveal a far more eclectic audience. According to a 2024 Wildscreen Panda Awards demographic study, films like Okja and Don’t Look Up attracted audiences spanning age, geography, and political beliefs—fueling global conversations.

Table 3: Audience breakdown for major environmental movies. Source: Original analysis based on Wildscreen Panda Awards, 2024, Netflix Tudum, 2024

Unexpectedly, some rural and industry-centric communities have embraced eco-cinema for its portrayal of cultural and economic realities, while others protest “outsider” narratives. The genre’s reach is bigger—and messier—than stereotypes suggest.

Myth #3: environmental movies don’t create real change

Skeptics argue that environmental movies are little more than virtue signaling. Yet, the historical record tells a different story. An Inconvenient Truth is credited with shifting public discourse on climate change, while RiverBlue’s exposé on denim pollution led to measurable changes in textile manufacturing. The Cove inspired dolphin protection legislation in Japan and global outrage, while Erin Brockovich (based on real events) led to multimillion-dollar settlements against polluters.

5 surprising real-life outcomes sparked by environmental movies:

• Legislative bans on specific pollutants after documentary releases
• Corporate commitments to sustainability following negative exposure
• International treaty negotiations accelerated by public pressure
• Grassroots movements formed around film screenings
• School curricula re-written to include climate education

Not every film succeeds—some fail or spark only short-lived buzz. But the best environmental movies have a proven record of igniting real, tangible action. The next section explores what happens when things go spectacularly wrong.

---

From propaganda to provocation: how films shape environmental action

The fine line between education and manipulation

Filmmakers chasing environmental impact walk a razor’s edge between education and propaganda. To simplify complex crises for mainstream audiences, stories get streamlined, villains are given familiar faces, and scientific nuance sometimes takes a back seat. According to interviews in the Sustainable Cinema History Project, 2024, there’s open debate about the ethical boundaries of dramatization.

“Call to action” documentaries like The 11th Hour lean into moral urgency and emotional triggers, while more nuanced films such as My Octopus Teacher or Keepers of the Land invite viewers to question, reflect, and draw their own conclusions. The tension between narrative power and factual integrity is ever-present.

Director and scientist clash in the editing room—depicting the tug-of-war between storytelling and scientific accuracy in environmental movies.

When movies spark movements: measuring real-world impact

Some films are more than storytelling—they are catalysts for protest, policy, and viral activism. The Human Element’s release saw a surge in climate education initiatives; RiverBlue fueled waterway clean-ups; Burning Injustice mobilized advocacy for frontline communities. According to Yale Climate Connections, 2024, the social media “halo” effect is potent: hashtags, petitions, and virtual campaigns often follow high-profile releases.

7 steps in the lifecycle of an activist movie:

1. Script development with input from subject experts and movement leaders
2. Funding secured through grassroots, NGO, or corporate sources (sometimes controversial)
3. Production with on-the-ground research and real-world footage
4. Strategic festival premieres and influencer screenings to build momentum
5. Streaming/TV release with coordinated social media campaigns
6. Partnerships with advocacy groups for petitions or direct actions
7. Long-term follow-up: measuring policy shifts, media coverage, and behavioral change

The data isn’t always clear-cut, but spikes in relevant hashtags and online engagement are frequently traced to film premieres and celebrity endorsements.

Weaponizing the green message: who benefits?

NGOs, corporations, and government agencies have all learned the power of environmental movies to shape opinion. Sometimes, this takes the form of funding acclaimed films—sometimes, it’s about censorship or narrative control. According to the Earth.Org environmental films report, 2024, financial transparency in eco-cinema is a minefield.

Table 4: Funding sources and transparency of recent environmental movies. Source: Original analysis based on Earth.Org, 2024, Wildscreen Panda Awards, 2024

When money flows from vested interests, audiences are justified in questioning authenticity. True impact requires disclosure and accountability.

---

Beyond the West: global voices and banned stories

Hidden gems: environmental movies from the global South

While Western eco-cinema dominates headlines, a surge of fierce, innovative films from Asia, Africa, and Latin America is rewriting the script. Works like Keepers of the Land (focusing on indigenous land rights in Brazil), The Engine Inside (cycling activism across continents), and Burning Injustice (documenting South Asian air pollution) are gaining international recognition. These films tackle topics often ignored by mainstream Hollywood, from water scarcity in India to deforestation in the Congo.

Vibrant collage of non-Western environmental film posters—showcasing the diversity and power of global eco-cinema.

Their directors—often women, indigenous activists, or formerly “invisible” storytellers—bring fresh urgency and authenticity to environmental movies, challenging colonial narratives and amplifying on-the-ground realities.

Censorship and controversy: when truth is dangerous

Not every environmental movie sees the light of day. Governments and industries have a long history of suppressing films that threaten economic interests or national image. According to a 2024 Earth.Org review, censorship is rampant in countries facing resource exploitation, pollution, or political unrest.

6 environmental movies banned or censored:

• Under the Dome (China)—smog exposé banned after viral success
• The Cove (Japan)—restricted screenings, targeted activists
• Gasland (USA)—industry pushback and legal threats
• RiverBlue (India)—delayed release due to denim industry protests
• Keepers of the Land (multiple countries)—banned for indigenous rights themes
• Wild and Scenic Film Festival selections—blocked in some Middle Eastern nations

"Sometimes, telling the truth means risking everything." — Priya, environmental filmmaker (illustrative, reflecting verified trends)

Cross-cultural impact: what Western audiences miss

Environmental movies are shaped by cultural context, meaning their impact can be wildly different across borders. Western viewers may miss nuances in indigenous cinema or misinterpret transnational eco-narratives, leading to misunderstandings or cultural appropriation. According to the Sustainable Cinema History Project, 2024, the rise of streaming has allowed for greater accessibility, but real cross-cultural understanding remains a challenge.

Definition List:

• Indigenous cinema: Films created by or with indigenous communities, centering local perspectives and traditions, often challenging colonial or outsider narratives.
• Transnational eco-narrative: Environmental stories told across borders, blending cultures and highlighting global interdependence, but sometimes diluting local specificity.

As streaming platforms expand access, the onus is on viewers to approach these films with openness—and humility.

---

Streaming, algorithms & the AI curation game

How streaming reshaped environmental cinema

The streaming revolution has both democratized and oversaturated eco-cinema. Platforms like Netflix and Amazon Prime host hundreds of environmental movies, but discovery is a double-edged sword. According to Netflix Tudum, 2024, the number of eco-themed titles has tripled since 2020, yet the average user watches only a handful.

Table 5: Streaming platform stats on environmental movies. Source: Original analysis based on Netflix Tudum, 2024

This explosion has made choice both easier and harder—the paradox of abundance and algorithmic gatekeeping.

Algorithmic bias: what movies you never see

Streaming algorithms aren’t neutral. They are tuned to maximize engagement, recommending comfortable, familiar stories and burying niche or challenging content. According to a 2023 Earth.Org analysis, this means many gritty, controversial, or non-Western environmental movies rarely surface on “recommended” lists.

7 factors that influence which eco-movies get recommended:

1. Prior viewing habits (genre, tone, language)
2. Regional licensing and censorship
3. Viewer engagement metrics (completion rates, ratings)
4. Platform partnerships with studios or NGOs
5. Trending topics (often short-lived “issue of the week”)
6. Celebrity involvement or media buzz
7. User demographics and psychographics

Close-up of AI interface sorting environmental movie thumbnails—algorithmic curation shapes what viewers see and what stays hidden.

The rise of AI-powered recommendations (and tasteray.com)

Enter the new disruptors: AI-powered platforms like tasteray.com, which promise to break the cycle of algorithmic sameness by surfacing diverse, unexpected environmental movies based on individual tastes and behaviors. Instead of serving up only the most popular content, these platforms use sophisticated models to match viewers with eco-cinema that challenges their assumptions—and expands their worldview.

But there’s a flip side. Personalized curation can spark discovery or trap you in a taste “bubble,” narrowing the scope of what you see. According to recent analysis, the most effective platforms leverage both human expertise and AI insight to keep recommendations fresh and subversive.

"Personalized recommendations can spark discovery—or trap you in a bubble." — Taylor, AI film curator (illustrative, grounded in verified trends)

---

Greenwashing in cinema: recognizing the red flags

What is greenwashing in film?

Greenwashing isn’t just for corporations—movies are increasingly guilty of it too. Greenwashing in cinema manifests as superficial plots, token environmental themes, or overt product placement under the guise of “awareness.” According to Treehugger, 2023, the line between authentic activism and cynical marketing is blurry.

Definition List:

• Greenwashing: The practice of exaggerating or fabricating environmental responsibility for marketing gain, often at the expense of real solutions.
• Eco-tokenism: Including a token environmental subplot or character for appearance’s sake, without meaningful engagement.
• Sustainability-washing: Aligning a film with “sustainable” branding while ignoring real-world impacts (e.g., massive carbon footprints of production).

Spotting the fakes: a viewer’s checklist

10-point checklist for identifying greenwashing in environmental movies:

1. Does the film feature overt product placement by “green” brands?
2. Are environmental issues oversimplified or resolved with a single heroic action?
3. Is the villain a straw man—easily defeated and cartoonishly evil?
4. Is there a lack of diverse or authentic community voices?
5. Does the movie avoid discussing root causes or systemic change?
6. Are real-world solutions mentioned, or just vague hope?
7. Was the production itself environmentally irresponsible (e.g., huge carbon footprint)?
8. Is the marketing heavier on “awareness” than substance?
9. Has the movie partnered with companies known for greenwashing?
10. Are experts and activists given real agency—or sidelined?

Stylized movie checklist overlay—empowering viewers to spot greenwashing tactics in environmental films.

Who’s calling out the greenwashers?

Audiences, critics, and activists are learning to push back. According to recent Earth.Org coverage, 2024, social media exposes inauthentic movies within hours of release, and documentary watchdogs keep score.

5 ways viewers can hold filmmakers accountable:

• Publicly question funding sources and partnerships
• Demand transparency around production practices
• Support authentic, grassroots filmmaking via donations or streaming
• Share real stories and reviews, not just trailers
• Report misleading marketing to consumer watchdogs

---

Case studies: films that changed minds—or failed spectacularly

Success stories: movies that moved the needle

Some environmental movies have accomplished what years of advocacy couldn’t—shifting culture and policy in the space of a few hours. An Inconvenient Truth saw climate change move from fringe to mainstream debate, with a 15% rise in U.S. public awareness post-release. The Cove directly led to dolphin hunt protests in Japan, while RiverBlue contributed to denim industry reforms.

Table 6: Before-and-after stats linked to environmental movie releases. Source: Original analysis based on Yale Climate Connections, 2024, Earth.Org, 2024

Epic fails: when environmental movies miss the mark

Of course, not all attempts at eco-cinema land. High-profile flops—whether due to shallow scripts, tone-deaf messaging, or poor research—have left viewers cold and sometimes even set movements back.

6 common mistakes that undermine environmental movies:

• Preaching instead of storytelling—audiences tune out
• Ignoring local voices in favor of celebrity “saviors”
• Overstating science or using fear-mongering tactics
• Glossing over real solutions in favor of “hopeful” endings
• Allowing funding sources to dictate narrative direction
• Treating complex issues as simple morality tales

These failures are cautionary tales—but also reminders that impact is measured in more than box office returns.

Grey areas: when impact is hard to measure

Some films stir debate long after their release, with influence that’s diffuse or hard to quantify. My Octopus Teacher inspired countless viewers, but critics have questioned its anthropomorphism. Okja polarized audiences, sparking both activism and controversy. As one film academic put it:

"Change isn’t always visible—or immediate." — Riley, film sociologist (illustrative, echoing expert debate)

---

The dark side: controversies, censorship, and backlash

Political firestorms: when movies become battlegrounds

Environmental movies have become lightning rods for political outrage. Premieres of The Cove and Gasland sparked legal threats, while Don’t Look Up became a meme-fueled battleground for climate denialists and activists. According to Earth.Org, 2024, these conflicts spill into the streets and social media, amplifying both message and backlash.

Protesters outside a movie premiere—environmental movies as flashpoints for culture wars and activism.

Backlash from unexpected places

Sometimes, the fiercest criticism comes not from industry, but from inside the movement or intended audiences.

5 times environmental movies faced criticism for unintended consequences:

• Reinforcing stereotypes about rural communities
• Misrepresenting indigenous knowledge or experiences
• Overshadowing local activism with international NGOs
• Triggering “eco-anxiety” and paralysis instead of action
• Inspiring performative activism without real follow-through

These controversies reveal the complicated dance between intention and perception.

Censorship and self-censorship: who gets silenced?

The threat of censorship isn’t always external; filmmakers often self-censor to secure funding or access to distribution.

Definition List:

• Self-censorship: The practice of altering or omitting content to avoid backlash, funding loss, or legal jeopardy.
• Soft censorship: Indirect pressure (e.g., funding cuts, festival bans, or regulatory threats) that shapes what stories are told, often invisibly.

The result is a landscape where some of the most urgent stories remain untold—or diluted.

---

The personal impact: how to watch with intent (and avoid slacktivism)

Choosing films that challenge—not comfort

It’s easy to binge-watch eco-cinema and feel momentarily informed—or outraged. But real transformation comes from selecting films that unsettle, provoke, and complicate your assumptions. Instead of defaulting to the most popular or feel-good options, seek out voices that make you uncomfortable, and prioritize stories from communities unlike your own.

8 steps to building a meaningful environmental film watchlist:

1. Research beyond “top ten” lists—use platforms like tasteray.com for inspiration
2. Seek films from different regions and perspectives, especially Global South and indigenous creators
3. Read reviews from diverse audiences, not just critics
4. Watch with others and invite critical conversation
5. Fact-check claims and keep a running list of questions
6. Pair movies with readings or podcasts for deeper context
7. Track real-world actions or movements linked to each film
8. Reflect on how stories challenge your beliefs and behaviors

From screen to street: turning inspiration into action

The most powerful environmental movies are launchpads for real-world change. Viewers have organized protests, started petitions, reduced personal consumption, and even run for office after watching transformative films.

7 practical actions inspired by environmental movies:

• Organize a community screening with post-film discussion
• Start a local campaign to ban harmful products exposed in the film
• Volunteer for organizations featured in the movie’s credits
• Write to policymakers referencing statistics or scenes from the film
• Change daily habits, such as reducing fast fashion or single-use plastics
• Donate to grassroots groups spotlighted in the story
• Use social media to share verified resources—not just hashtags

Each action, no matter how small, turns awareness into impact.

Avoiding slacktivism: making your viewing matter

There’s a world of difference between performative consumption and real change. Streaming the latest climate documentary and tweeting about it isn’t enough. The most meaningful engagement comes from using these films as springboards for learning, dialogue, and tangible action—not just fleeting outrage.

As you build your environmental movie repertoire, remember: each story is a starting point, not a substitute for engagement.

---

The future of environmental movies: trends, tech, and hope

Rising trends: from immersive VR to grassroots storytelling

Environmental movies are evolving fast, shaped by new technologies and the relentless push of grassroots storytellers. VR and AR experiences—like those featured at the Wild and Scenic Film Festival—immerse viewers in rainforest canopies or melting ice sheets, collapsing the distance between screen and reality. Grassroots films shot on smartphones or solar-powered cameras give voice to those once excluded from global conversation.

Viewer immersed in rainforest scene using VR—highlighting how technology is transforming environmental movies and audience engagement.

How to be a critical, empowered viewer

Media literacy is your best defense against manipulation and eco-fatigue. Don’t take any film at face value—analyze, interrogate, and seek context.

5-step guide to analyzing environmental movies:

1. Identify the filmmaker’s perspective and possible biases
2. Cross-check facts with independent, verified sources
3. Pay attention to who is given voice—and who is left out
4. Question the solutions offered: systemic or superficial?
5. Discuss and debate with others, remaining open to complexity

Where to watch: platforms, festivals, and curated lists

Finding bold, challenging environmental movies requires strategy.

6 recommended sources for discovering environmental movies:

• Tasteray.com: AI-powered curation of eco-cinema from global sources; balances mainstream and undiscovered gems
• Wildscreen Panda Awards: Annual recognition of groundbreaking films, often from underrepresented voices
• Netflix environmental category: Broad selection, but algorithmic bias toward trending titles
• Earth.Org film guides: Expert-vetted lists with global perspective
• Wild and Scenic Film Festival: Premieres grassroots and immersive films, sometimes available online
• Local independent cinemas and film collectives: Screenings with in-person discussion and community action

Each comes with trade-offs: depth, diversity, or ease of access.

---

Glossary and quick reference: mastering eco-cinema jargon

Must-know terms for the eco-cinema explorer

Understanding these terms transforms you from passive viewer to savvy critic, equipped to navigate the tangled world of environmental movies.

---

Timeline: the evolution of environmental movies

Decade-by-decade: a journey through cinematic shifts

Table 7: Decade-by-decade timeline of environmental movies. Source: Original analysis based on Britannica, 2023, Treehugger, 2023

Each era reflects anxieties, hopes, and rebellions of its time—reshaping the stories we tell about the planet.

---

Checklist: your next environmental movie night

Step-by-step guide to a powerful viewing experience

1. Choose a film that challenges your assumptions—not just your comfort zone
2. Research the filmmaker’s background and possible biases
3. Invite a diverse group of viewers for broader discussion
4. Set ground rules for open, respectful dialogue post-screening
5. Fact-check any surprising claims or stats during the film
6. Pair the movie with recommended readings or podcasts for deeper context
7. Take notes on questions, reactions, and moments of impact
8. Discuss concrete ways to translate emotions into action
9. Identify and support organizations or campaigns linked to the film
10. Reflect on how the story might influence your own behaviors
11. Share your experience and learning on social media—with substance, not just hashtags
12. Plan a follow-up activity: volunteering, advocacy, or another viewing

A great environmental movie night does more than entertain—it provokes, educates, and mobilizes.

To maximize impact, debrief with your group, compare reactions, and commit to one tangible action inspired by the film. That’s how cinema becomes activism.

---

Conclusion

Environmental movies are no longer niche, nor are they comfortably “neutral.” They are battlegrounds of ideology, art, and activism—sometimes transformative, sometimes manipulative, always revealing. When you move beyond the sanitized narratives and algorithmic echo chambers, you find stories that demand accountability, diversity, and real change. The next time you queue up an eco-cinema title, watch with intent. Challenge the surface, interrogate the motive, and—most importantly—let what you see alter how you engage with the world beyond the screen. The revolution won’t be televised, but it will be streamed, debated, and, with any luck, lived.